<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Email Transmit Email Marketing Info Center Blog - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-a321ceeb" type="application/json"/><link>http://emailtransmit.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://emailtransmit.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:28:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: B2B vs. B2C Email Marketing: 7 Differences</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/11/b2b-vs-b2c-email-marketing-7-differences/#comment-397355126</link><description>Great comparison, quite informative I didn't realize before that there are so many differences.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">email archiving</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:28:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Reasons Email Marketing is Better Than Social Media</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/06/10-reasons-email-marketing-is-better-than-social-media/#comment-392106903</link><description>I enjoyed reading your post, and I agree that&lt;br&gt;social media marketing and email marketing are not mutually exclusive, and&lt;br&gt;should be used together; however, I believe that social media marketing has&lt;br&gt;more potential and is of more importance....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:24:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: B2B vs. B2C Email Marketing: 7 Differences</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/11/b2b-vs-b2c-email-marketing-7-differences/#comment-376038401</link><description>I always find that B2B emailing is always more successful than B2C... more opens, more clicks more interest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EmailLister72</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:21:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Email &amp;#8220;Bulletproof&amp;#8221; Button Generator</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2010/06/the-email-bulletproof-button-generator/#comment-362927787</link><description>I can not get the image or color to render in Thunderbird 8.0.  Anyone else noticed that?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zac</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:50:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Holiday Email Marketing: Planning and Ideas</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/10/holiday-emails-planning-and-ideas/#comment-332714726</link><description>Great article!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:40:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6 Email Tips Based on Eye Tracking</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/09/6-email-tips-based-on-eye-tracking/#comment-315757375</link><description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Eye tracking email-marketing tips are very helpful for us in&lt;br&gt;improving Email marketing. You have done a great job by sharing this post with us.&lt;br&gt;I like this. Keep it up. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zena</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:21:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 9 Guidelines for Successful B2B Email Marketing</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2010/11/9-guidelines-for-successful-b2b-email-marketing/#comment-268456375</link><description>Nice info.....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">memory foam mattress review</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 02:40:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Tactics For Successful Mobile Email Marketing</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/02/5-tactics-for-successful-mobile-email-marketing/#comment-242328681</link><description>Thanks for these very useful tactics! I will use these in my &lt;a href="http://www.iemailer.com/bulk-email-marketing-campaign.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;bulk email marketing campaign&lt;/a&gt;. I'm sure these things will help.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 20:42:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Common Mistakes in Email Marketing Strategy</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/05/5-common-mistakes-in-email-marketing-strategy/#comment-237886985</link><description>many of the email marketers are doing these mistakes but if they can avoid doing all these mistakes they can surely have a successful campaign.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kathrynrinehart</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:06:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6 Design Tips for Mobile Email</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/02/6-design-tips-for-mobile-email/#comment-236346053</link><description>The iPhone will automatically scale an email width to 320 pixels (when held in portrait mode). If you design an email at 640 pixels wide, the scaling will be an exact 50% which renders nicely on the iPhone.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A 600 pixel email will also scale to 320, but that ratio of 53.33% scaling sometimes leads to layout issues as the math there isn't as exact.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We recommend creating emails at 640 pixels wide so they scale evenly when viewed by iPhone users.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Q. Holden-Bache</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:43:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6 Design Tips for Mobile Email</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/02/6-design-tips-for-mobile-email/#comment-236251110</link><description>Thanks for this article! I was wondering if anyone had any more information on #2. &lt;br&gt;Does it matter if the email originally was 600 or 640 px, if the phone resizes it to 320 px anyway? &lt;br&gt;By "more exact scaling", did you mean that it's easier for humans to calculate any scaling ratios?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cmay</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:57:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Reasons Email Marketing is Better Than Social Media</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/06/10-reasons-email-marketing-is-better-than-social-media/#comment-234974369</link><description>Great post Adam. I love SM but preach all the time about the list ownership aspect and the fact its an asset of my clients business. I'd be inclined to list that as #1 of the 11.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Craig Utt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 21:21:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Reasons Email Marketing is Better Than Social Media</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/06/10-reasons-email-marketing-is-better-than-social-media/#comment-234133418</link><description>Yes- list ownership is another advantage. That's a pretty big one- might have to change the post to "11 reasons". Thanks for the comment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Q. Holden-Bache</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:23:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Reasons Email Marketing is Better Than Social Media</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/06/10-reasons-email-marketing-is-better-than-social-media/#comment-234120213</link><description>Really great list! I would also add that with email, you own your list. In social media have no ownership; marketers are simply granted access to a 3rd-party platform.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Indiemark</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:57:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 9 Guidelines for Successful B2B Email Marketing</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2010/11/9-guidelines-for-successful-b2b-email-marketing/#comment-233221479</link><description>Thanks for sharing great informaton..........</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">B2B</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 06:42:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Email vs. Social: Which is Best for Sharing?</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/05/email-vs-social-which-is-best-for-sharing/#comment-229232860</link><description>Hi nice post.Social media is right finding a  large numbers of  people &lt;br&gt;at time, whole segments of the population aren't using social media.Its the best way of sharing content rather then email.Keep sharing with us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephanie </dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 08:30:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Email vs. Social: Which is Best for Sharing?</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/05/email-vs-social-which-is-best-for-sharing/#comment-212147370</link><description>81% of marketers believe social media extends the reach of email &lt;br&gt;content to new markets (MarketingSherpa)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AnthonyWS</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 09:43:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Email vs. Social: Which is Best for Sharing?</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/05/email-vs-social-which-is-best-for-sharing/#comment-210736708</link><description>I believe that's the biggest takeaway too. Email is used by everyone and accessible by everyone, while there's still gaps in social based on demographics and accessibility. It seems that professionals still prefer email too, although that gap is closing. One of the things I plan to implement is more email sharing from social channels, as users may want to pass along something seen in a social channel to a grandparent or colleague and without email that sharing may not occur.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Q. Holden-Bache</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 12:15:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Email vs. Social: Which is Best for Sharing?</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/05/email-vs-social-which-is-best-for-sharing/#comment-210687733</link><description>"The gaps between email and social aren’t enough to dismiss one channel from your strategy."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is crucial. While social media is a perfect way to reach large numbers of specific people at once, whole segments of the population aren't using social media, or at least not en masse. Targeting your channel as well as your message is still the only way to reach certain groups of people, i.e., older people and people who can't access social media at work, where they spend 8-12 hours each day.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hilary Short</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 11:00:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Email vs. Social: Which is Best for Sharing?</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/05/email-vs-social-which-is-best-for-sharing/#comment-210665284</link><description>I agree completely. Thanks for your comment!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Q. Holden-Bache</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 10:26:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Email vs. Social: Which is Best for Sharing?</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/05/email-vs-social-which-is-best-for-sharing/#comment-210649002</link><description>There are some pretty interesting findings in the study. This really shows that if you aren't making "social email", then you really are limiting the reach and effectiveness of your campaign. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great Insight.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dewane Mutunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 10:03:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Email vs. Social: Which is Best for Sharing?</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/05/email-vs-social-which-is-best-for-sharing/#comment-210623995</link><description>I'm surprised it's only 27 million pieces being shared per day.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andy browning</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 09:28:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Email vs. Social: Which is Best for Sharing?</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/05/email-vs-social-which-is-best-for-sharing/#comment-210621882</link><description>Good insight here. Thanks for consolidating.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Indiemark</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 09:25:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gmail Smart Labels: Bad News For Email Marketers?</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/04/gmail-smart-labels-bad-news-for-email-marketers/#comment-192014055</link><description>Jeff- I agree that "bulk" has a negative feel to it, but it is definitely not a spam folder. It's simply emails that you sign up for that get sent to many people at once. So if you get any email newsletters, offers from retailers, etc., they'll go in that folder. The idea is that all of those mass communications can be set aside so you can go through them at once, and keep your main inbox to the personal emails that are likely more important.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also note that Smart Labels is an optional setting- you must activate it for it to filter your email. So users who do nothing will keep seeing all their incoming emails stay in their inbox.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Q. Holden-Bache</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:15:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Email Basics 202: The Top 15 Email Marketing Mistakes</title><link>http://infocenter.emailtransmit.com/2011/03/email-basics-202-the-top-15-email-marketing-mistakes/#comment-191772879</link><description>well done antonio... always insightful.... love that sloppy work is number 1!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tricky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:19:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
